ایشلدن:Ziraksima/کؤمک:سیزین ایلک مقاله‌نیز

مقاله یازماق
مقاله‌نی نئجه یارادا بیله‌جه‌ینیزی اؤیرنین.

بورادا یئنیسینیز؟

مقاله یاراتماق ویکی‌پدیادا اَن چتین ایشلردن بیریدیر و ویکی‌پدیانین نئجه ایشلدیگی باره‌ده اَطرافلی معلومات اَلده‌ائتمک اۆچون اَوّلجه بیزه دیگر تاپشیریقلاردا کؤمک ائتسنیز، اۇغور شانسینیز داها یۆکسک اوْلاجاق. داها سونرا مقاله یاراتماق اۆچون همیشه گئری قاییدا بیلرسینیز؛ تلسمک یوخدور!

ویکی‌پدیایا خوش گلمیسینیز! یئنی دییشدیریجی کیمی سیز ویکی‌پدیاچی اوْلاجاقسینیز. یئنی مقاله‌یه باشلامازدان قاباق، لۆطفا، ویکی‌پدیانین اهمیتلی طلبلرینی نظردن کئچیرین. قیساجاسی، مقاله‌نین مؤوضوعسو آرتیق اعتیبارلی، ایکینجی درجه‌لی، تامامیله مۆستقیل قایناقلاردا، مثلاً، کیتابلار، قزئته‌لر، ژورناللار، اعتیبارلی علمی ژورناللار و طلبلره جاواب وئرن وب‌سایتلار کیمی مؤوضوعنو اَطرافلی شکیلده نظردن کئچیرن منبعلرده درج ائدیلمه‌لی اوْلمالیدیر. نۆفوذلو چاپا اَساسلانان منبعلرله عینی طلبلر. ویکی‌پدیاداکی معلوماتلار یوخلانیلا بیلن اوْلمالیدیر؛ اَگر مؤوضوع ایله باغلی اعتیبارلی اۆچونجو طرفی منبعلری تاپماق مۆمکون دئییلسه، اوْ زامان اوْنون آیریجا مقاله‌سی اوْلمامالیدیر. مووضوع ایله باغلی مقاله‌نین مؤوجود اوْلمادیغینا اَمین اوْلماق اۆچون اَوّلجه ویکی‌پدیادا آختاریش ائدین.

مقاله ویزاردی یارادیلما مقاله‌لری پروسِسی واسیطه‌سیله مقاله یاراتماغینیزا کؤمک ائتمک اۆچون مؤوجوددور، بورادا مقاله باخیلاجاق و درج اوْلونماق اۆچون نظردن کئچیریله‌جک. نظره آلین کی، گؤزله‌نیلن ایشلرین زامانی اۇزوندور (حال-حاضیردا ۰ گؤزله‌نیلن ثبت اولونموش مقاله وار؛ چوخ واخت آیلار چکیر). بیرباشا اَساس مکاندا مقاله‌لر یاراتماق ایمکانی مۆعین تجروبه‌یه مالیک دییشدیریجلریله محدودلاشیر. باشقاسی طرفیندن یارادیلا بیلن یئنی مقاله‌نی نئجه طلب ائتمک باره‌ده معلومات اۆچون ایسته‌نیلن مقاله‌لره باخین.

زحمت اوْلماسا، دییشدیرمه ایله باغلی اَساسلاری اؤیرنمک اۆچون تانیشلیق درسلیگیمیزه نظر سالین و یا ویکی‌پدیایا تؤهفه وئرمه‌یی نظردن کئچیرین. مووجود مقاله‌لر اۆزرینده ایشلمک پروتوکوللاریمیزی و اۆسلوب کونوانسییالاریمیزی اؤیرنمک اۆچون یاخشی بیر یولدور؛ یاردیمینیزا احتیاجی اوْلان بیر سیرا مقاله‌لر و کؤمک ائدبیله‌جیینیز تاپشیریقلار اۆچون وظیفه مرکزینه باخین.



اساسلار دَییشدیر

بیرینجیسی، ویکی‌پدیانین داوطلبلر طرفیندن یازیلمیش بیلیکلیک اوْلدوغونو نظره آلین. بیزیم ماموریتیمیز اؤیرنمک ایستین اینسانلارا فایدالی اوْلماق اۆچون اعتیبارلی بیلیکلری پایلاشماقدیر. بیز سوسیال مدیا دئییلیک، هانسیسا شیرکتی و یا محصولو و یا شخصی تانیتماق، کیمینسه و یا هر هانسی بیر شئیین له‌ینه و یا علیه‌ینه چیخیش ائتمک، نه دکی، آرتیق اعتیبارلی نشر مؤوضوعسو اوْلمایان مؤوضوعلار حاقیندا معلوماتی دۆنیایا ایلک اوْلاراق اعلان ائتمک اۆچون یئر دئییلیک. لوطفا بونو همیشه یاددا ساخلایین. (بو، «ویکی‌پدیا نه دئییل؟» ده تصویر ائدیلمیشدیر.)

بیز «قبول ائدیلمیش بیلیکلری» یۆکسک کیفیتلی، درج اوْلونموش قایناقلاردا تاپیریق. «یوکسک کیفیتلی» دئدیکده، بیز نۆفوذلو نشریاتلارین، حؤرمتلی قزئتلرین، اعتیبارلی علمی و آکادمیک ژورناللارین، اَدبیات جامعه‌لرینین و فکتلرین یوخلانیلماسی و دقیقلیگی ایله تانینان دیگر منبعلرین کیتابلارینی نظرده توتوروق. بو، عۆمومیتله تصادوفی شخصی وبسایتلاردان، بلاقلاردان، فوروم یازیلاریندان، فیسبوک، لینکدین و یا تویتتر مضمونوندان، آچیق ویکیلر (اوْ جۆمله‌دن دیگر ویکی‌پدیا مقاله‌لری داخیل اوْلماقلا) کیمی اؤز-وزونه نشر اوْلونان منبعلردن ایستیفاده ائتمه‌مک دئمکدیر. بیز بئله یۆکسک کیفیتلی، درج اوْلونموش منبعلری ویکی‌پدیا مقاله‌لرینده خولاصه‌لشدیریریک. بوتون ائتدیگیمیز بودور! لوطفا، اَمین اوْلون کی، ویکی‌پدیادا یازدیغینیز هر شئی بۇ جۆر منبعلره اَساسلانسین – عقلینیزه گلنلره دئییل.

ایلک مقاله‌نیزده سیزه کؤمک ائده‌بیلجک بعضی مصلحتلر:

  • بیر ایشلدن حسابی یارادین. سیزه لازیم اوْلان تک شئی ایشلدن‌آدی و رمز سئچمکدیر. بو سیزه مۆختلیف صلاحیتلر وئره‌جک. مقاله‌لرده دییشیکلیک ائتدیکدن بیر نئچه گۆن سونرا اوْ، سیزه یئنی‌سینی یاراتماق اۆچون گۆج وئرجک.
  • اوّلجه مشق ائدین. باشلامازدان قاباق، یازماق و ویکی‌پدیانین ایشاره‌له‌مه دیلیندن ایستیفاده ائتمک حیسی اَلده ائتمک اۆچون مؤوجود مقاله‌لری دییشدیرمه‌یه چالیشین. – دییشدیرمه اَساسلارینی اؤیرنمک اۆچون اَوّلجه درسلیک و یا ویکی‌پدیایا تؤهفه وئرن ایجمال واسیطه‌سیله گزمه‌یی تؤوصیه ائدیریک.
  • Biographies of living people are among the most difficult articles to get right. Consider starting with something easier.
  • Search Wikipedia to see if an article already exists on the subject, perhaps under a different title. If an article already exists, feel free to make any constructive edits to improve it, while citing the sources that verify your changes. Note that citing the sources is crucial. If you write that the sky is blue, the Sun is sunny, or the water is wet, the first thing the editor would ask is source. And it must be a reliable source. Otherwise your edit would be deleted as unsourced. On the other hand, if you find a reliable source saying that the water is dry, your edit would be safe.
  • No article on the subject exists? OK, now you need to try to determine if the subject you want to write about is what we call "notable" on Wikipedia. The question we ask is: does this topic belong in an encyclopedia?
  • More than 200 articles are typically deleted from the English Wikipedia every day, mostly because of lack of notability. Please make sure your topic is notable by our definition before you spend time and effort on it. An article on a non-notable subject will be rejected or deleted. No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability.
  • We generally judge this by asking if there are at least three high-quality sources that a) have substantial discussion of the subject (not just a mention) and b) are written and published independently of the subject (so, a company's website or press releases are not OK). Everything here is based on high-quality independent sources, and without them, we generally just cannot write an article. By far, the largest cause of frustration for a writer of a new article is caused by lack of notability. Anything else can be corrected by improving an article, but lack of notability means the article will not remain on Wikipedia, regardless of how well written it is. To avoid frustration, start by determining notability before you spend any effort on an article. If you are not sure if the subject you want to write about is "notable", you can ask questions at the Wikipedia Teahouse.
  • If those sources exist, we also ask that you demonstrate that notability of the topic, by citing these reliable, secondary, independent sources that treat the topic in substantive detail. Doing so for all significant factual statements in an article is also necessary to meet another core content standard: verifiability of information.
  • We cannot stress enough how important citing your sources is at Wikipedia – it is at the heart of all of our core inclusion policies and guidelines. In order to learn about how to do so, we suggest starting with Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing, and then seeing ویکی‌پدیا:قایناقلارا ایستیناد for a more involved treatment, noting that each contains see also sections linking to additional help pages, guides, and tutorials. There is also a visual guide and a screencast available to walk you through aspects of citing your sources, as well as a screencast demonstrating the referencing features of Wikipedia's editing toolbars.
  • Please be mindful of conflict of interest editing. If you have one, you will probably have a hard time writing a good enough Wikipedia article (this is not about you, it is just human nature). However, if you insist on trying, you need to disclose your conflict of interest, and try very hard not to allow your "external interest" to drive you to abuse Wikipedia. Please try hard to hear the feedback from independent people who review any draft you create before it is published and made available in the main encyclopedia. Your conflict of interest might lead you to believe something is "notable" when it isn't, and to argue too hard for it to be published here.
  • The Article Wizard will help you create your article in Draft space, and will put some useful templates into your draft, including the button to click when you are ready to submit the draft for review.


بو نوکته‌لر آشاغیدا داها اَطرافلی توضیح اوْلونور.

If you are logged in, and your account is autoconfirmed, you can also use this box below to create an article, by entering the article name in the box below and then clicking "Create page".

بیر مووجود مقاله‌نی آختارین دَییشدیر

تورکجه ویکی‌پدیاسیندا آرتیق ۲۴۳٬۵۰۵ مقاله وار. Before creating an article, try to make sure there is not already an article on the same topic, perhaps under a slightly different name. Search for the article, and review Wikipedia's article titling policy before creating your first article. If an article on your topic already exists, but you think people might look for it under some different name or spelling, learn how to create redirects to alternative titles; adding needed redirects is a good way to help Wikipedia. If you're not already autoconfirmed, you can request a redirect to be created at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories, where a volunteer will review the request, and if it seems like a plausible search term, accept the redirect request. Also, remember to check the article's deletion log in order to avoid creating an article that has already been deleted. (In some cases, the topic may be suitable even if deleted in the past; the past deletion may have been because it was a copyright violation, did not explain the importance of the topic, or on other grounds addressed to the writing rather than the topic's suitability.)

If a search does not find the topic, consider broadening your search to find existing articles that might include the subject of your article. For example, if you want to write an article about a band member, you might search for the band and then add information about your subject as a section within that broader article.

یئنیدیر؟ یازین، سونرا «گئت (باشلیغی سینایین)»

قایناقلارین توپلانماسی دَییشدیر

Gather sources for the information you will be writing about. You will use references to establish notability and to cite particular facts. References used to support notability must meet additional criteria beyond reliability. References used for specific facts need not meet these additional criteria.

To be worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, a subject must be sufficiently notable, and that notability must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.

As noted, the sources you use must be reliable; that is, they must be sources that exercise some form of editorial control and have some reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Print sources (and web-based versions of those sources) tend to be the most reliable, though some web-only sources may also be reliable. Examples might include (but are not limited to) books published by major publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals, websites of any of the above, and other websites that meet the same requirements as a reputable print-based source.

In general, sources with no editorial control are not reliable. These include (but are not limited to) books published by vanity presses, self-published 'zines', blogs, web forums, Usenet discussions, personal social media, fan sites, vanity websites that permit the creation of self-promotional articles, and other similar venues. If anyone at all can post information without anyone else checking that information, it is probably not reliable.

If there are reliable sources (such as newspapers, journals, or books) with extensive information published over an extended period about a subject, then that subject is notable. You must cite such sources as part of the process of creating (or expanding) the Wikipedia article as evidence of notability for evaluation by other editors. If you cannot find such reliable sources that provide extensive and comprehensive information about your proposed subject, then the subject is not notable or verifiable and almost certainly will be deleted. So your first job is to go find references to cite.

There are many places to find reliable sources, including your local library, but if internet-based sources are to be used, start with books and news archive searches rather than a web search.

Once you have references for your article, you can learn to place the references into the article by reading Help:Referencing for beginners and ویکی‌پدیا:قایناقلارا ایستیناد. Do not worry too much about formatting citations properly. It would be great if you did that, but the main thing is to get references into the article, even if they are not perfectly formatted.

قاچیلماسی لازیم اوْلان شئی‌لر دَییشدیر

اؤزونوز، عایله‌نیز و یا دوستلارینیز، وب-سایتینیز، ایشتیراک ائتدیگینیز قروپ، مۆعلیمینیز، اۇیدوردوغونوز سؤز و یا یازدیغینیز حیکایه حاقیندا مقاله‌لر
If you or someone or something you are personally involved with is worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia, let someone else add that article. Putting your friends in an encyclopedia may seem like a nice surprise or an amusing joke, but those articles are likely to be removed. In this process, feelings may be hurt and you may be blocked from editing if you repeatedly make attempts to re-create the article. These things can be avoided by a little forethought on your part. The article may remain if you have enough humility to make it neutral and the subject really is notable, but even then it's best to submit a draft for approval and consensus of the community instead of just posting it, since unconscious biases may still exist that you are unaware of.
Advertising
Please do not try to promote your product or business. Please do not post external links to your commercial website. We do have articles about products such as Kleenex and Sharpies and about notable businesses such as مک‌دونالدز, but if you are writing about a product or business, be sure you write from a neutral point of view, that you have no conflict of interest, and that you are able to find references in reliable sources that are independent from the subject you are writing about. For a business or similar organization, make sure it meets the specific notability guidelines for businesses and read the FAQ for non-profits and for-profit businesses.
Attacks on a person or organization
Material that violates our biographies of living persons policy or is intended to threaten, defame, or harass its subject or another entity is not permitted. Unsourced negative information, especially in articles about living people, is quickly removed, and attack pages may be deleted immediately.
Personal essays or original research
Wikipedia surveys existing human knowledge; it is not a place to publish new work. Do not write articles that present your own original theories, opinions, or insights, even if you can support them by reference to accepted work. A common mistake is to present a novel synthesis of ideas in an article. Remember, just because both Fact A and Fact B are true does not mean that A caused B, or vice versa (fallacies or post hoc ergo propter hoc). If the synthesis or causation is true, locate and cite reliable sources that report the connection.
Non-notable topics
People frequently add pages to Wikipedia without considering whether the topic is really notable enough to go into an encyclopedia. Because Wikipedia does not have the space limitations of paper-based encyclopedias, our notability policies and guidelines allow a wide range of articles – however, they do not allow every topic to be included. A particularly common special case of this is pages about people, companies, or groups of people that do not substantiate the notability or importance of their subject with reliable sources, so we have decided that such pages may be speedily deleted under our speedy deletion policy. This can offend – so please consider whether your chosen topic is notable enough for Wikipedia, and then substantiate the notability or importance of your subject by citing those reliable sources in the process of creating your article. Wikipedia is not a directory of everything in existence.
A single sentence or only a website link
Articles need to have real content of their own.
See also:

و احتیاطلی اوْلون... دَییشدیر

Copyright

As a general rule, do not copy-paste text from other websites. (There are a few limited exceptions, and a few words as part of a properly cited and clearly attributed quotation is OK.)

Wikipedia:Copy-paste

Copying things. Do not violate copyrights!
Never copy-paste text into a Wikipedia article unless it is a relatively short quotation, placed in quotation marks, and cited using an inline citation. Even material that you are sure is in the public domain must be attributed to the source, or the result, while not a copyright violation, is plagiarism. Also, note that most web pages are not in the public domain and that most song lyrics are not, either. In fact, most things published after شابلون:Not-PD-US-expired-min-year and almost all works written since ۱ ژانویه, ۱۹۷۸ (میلادی), are automatically protected by copyright under the Copyright Act of 1976 even if they have no copyright notice or © symbol. If you think what you are contributing is in the public domain, say where you got it, either in the article or on the discussion page, and on the discussion page give the reason why you think it is in the public domain (e.g., "It was published in 1895..."). For more information, see Wikipedia:Copyrights (which includes instructions for verifying permission to copy previously published text) and our non-free content guidelines for text. Finally, please note that superficial modification of material, such as minor rewording, is insufficient to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations. See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing.
Good sources

1. have a reputation for reliability: they are reliable sources
2. are independent of the subject
3. are verifiable by other editors

Good research and citing your sources
Articles written out of thin air may be better than nothing, but they are hard to verify, which is an important part of building a trusted reference work. Please research with the best sources available and cite them properly. Doing this, along with not copying text, will help avoid any possibility of اينتيهال. We welcome good short articles, called "stubs", that can serve as launching pads from which others can take off – stubs can be relatively short, a few sentences, but should provide some useful information. If you do not have enough material to write a good stub, you probably should not create an article. At the end of a stub, you should include a "stub template" like this: {{قارالاما}}. (Other Wikipedians will appreciate it if you use a more specific stub template, like {{art-stub}}. See the list of stub types for a list of all specific stub templates.) Stubs help track articles that need expansion.
Articles or statements about living persons
As with all topics, articles written about living persons must be referenced so that they can be verified. This requirement is enforced far more rigorously for any statements about a living (or recently deceased) person, and reviewers are supposed to immediately remove any unreferenced material without discussion. It is good practice to add your references as you write the article to avoid this immediate removal.
Advocacy and controversial material
Please do not write articles that advocate one particular viewpoint on politics, religion, or anything else. Understand what we mean by a neutral point of view before tackling this sort of topic.
Articles that contain different definitions of the topic
Articles are primarily about what something is, not any term(s). If the article is just about a word or phrase and especially if there are very different ways that a term is used, it usually belongs in Wiktionary. Instead, try to write a good short first paragraph that defines one subject as well as some more material to go with it.
Organization
Make sure there are incoming links to the new article from other Wikipedia articles (click "What links here" in the toolbox) and that the new article is included in at least one appropriate category (see کؤمک:بؤلمه). Otherwise, it will be difficult for readers to find the article.
Local-interest articles
These are articles about places such as schools or streets that are of interest to a relatively small number of people such as alumni or people who live nearby. There is no consensus about such articles, but some will challenge them if they include nothing that shows how the place is special and different from tens of thousands of similar places. Photographs add interest. Try to give local-interest articles local colour. Third-party sources are the only way to prove that the subject you are writing about is notable.
Breaking news events
While Wikipedia accepts articles about notable recent events, articles about breaking news events with no enduring notability are not appropriate for our project. Consider writing such articles on our sister project Wikinews. See Wikipedia:Notability (events) for further information.
Editing on the wrong page
If you're trying to create a new page, you'll start with a completely empty edit box. If you see text in the editing box that is filled with words you didn't write (for example, the contents of this page), you're accidentally editing a pre-existing page. Don't use "Publish changes" to make your additions. See کؤمک:یئنی صفحه یاراتماق, and start over.

مقاله‌نین مؤوضوعسو ایله یاخیندان ایرتیباطینیز وارمی؟ دَییشدیر

ویکی‌پدیا هر کسین دییشیکلیک ائده‌بیله‌جه‌یی بیلیکلیکدیر، لاکین پوللو و یا ایسپانسرلیک ائدن دییشدیریجیلر اۆچون خوصوصی تعلیماتلار وار. بو تعلیماتلار غرضلی مقاله‌لرین قارشیسینی آلماق و ایجتیماعییتین ویکی‌پدیاداکی مضمونون غرضسیز اوْلدوغونا و ویجدانلا علاوه ائدیلدیگینه اینامینی قوروماق اۆچون نظرده توتولوب. (ویکی‌پدیانین منفعتلر توققوشماسی تعلیماتینا باخین.)

رسمی قایدا بودور کی، دییشدیریجیلر داوطلب اوْلمالیدیرلار. بو اوْ دئمکدیر کی، ویکی‌پدیا سیزه موستقیم و یا غیرموستقیم یوللا پول اؤدین شخصلر، شیرکتلر، تشکیلاتلار، محصوللار/خیدمتلر و یا سیاسی سببلر حاقیندا مقاله‌لرده دییشیکلیک ائتمکدن چکیندیریر. بورایا شیرکت‌داخیلی پی‌آر دپارتامانلاری و مارکتینق دپارتامانلاری، شیرکتین دیگر ایشچیلری، ایجتیماعیتله علاقه‌لر شیرکتلری و پوبلیسیستلر، سوسیال مدیا مصلحتچیلری و آنلاین ایداره ائدیلمه‌سی مصلحتچیلر داخیلدیر. بونونلا بئله، ویکی‌پدیا اۆزرینده ایشلدیکلری مقاله‌لره مۆعین منسوبییتی اوْلان اینسانلارین بؤیوک حجمده خوش نیّتلی تؤهفه‌لرینی تانییر.

بورادا بعضی اَساس قایدالار وار. قئید ائدک کی، بو، مۆطلق تام لیست دئییل، اوْنا گؤره ده بۇ قایدالاری تطبیق ائدرکن ساغلام دۆشونجه‌دن ایستیفاده ائدین. بو قایدالاری پوزسانیز و یا سیستمله اوْیون اوْیناسانیز، دییشدیرمه‌لرینیز گئری قایتاریلاجاق و مقاله(لر) و دیگر دییشدیرمه‌لرینیز دیگر ویکی‌پدیا دییشدیریجیلری طرفیندن علاوه یوخلامایا معروض قالا بیلر. حسابینیز دا بلوکلانا بیلر.

قاچیلماسی لازیم اوْلان شئی‌لر دیقّتلی اوْلماق لازیم اوْلانلار توهفه وئرمک اۆچون اعلا یوللار
  • تبلیغات دیلی علاوه ائتمیین
  • مقاله‌دن منفی و یا تنقیدی متنی سیلمیین
  • بیردن چوْخ اینسانین پایلاشماسی اۆچون «قروپ» حسابی یاراتمایین
  • مقاله‌نین دانیشیق صفحه‌سینده منسوبیّتینیزی آچیقلاماقدان چکینمیین
  • علاوه ائتدیگینیز و یا دییشیکلیک ائتدیگینیز هر هانسی مضموندا طرفسیز و حقیقی تونو قورویون
  • علاوه ائتدیگینیز هر هانسی یئنی ایفاده‌لر اۆچون مۆستقیل، اعتیبارلی منبعلره (مثلاً، اَساس مدیا مقاله‌سی) ایستیناد ائدین – حتا ایفاده‌نین دوغرولوغونا اَمین اوْلسانیز بئله (مثلاً، ایشینیز حاقیندادیر)؛ یالنیز مؤعتبر منبعده درج اوْلوندوغو تقدیرده بیانات وئرین.
  • مقاله‌لره کیچیک دییشدیرمه‌لر/دوزلیشلر ائتمک (مثلاً، یازی خطالاری، کئچیدلری دۆزلتمک، اعتیبارلی منبعلره ایستینادلار علاوه ائتمک)
  • اَگر غرضلیسینیزسه، مقاله‌نین دانیشیق صفحه‌سینده (اَساس مقاله صفحه‌سینده دئییل) یئنی مقاله متنی و یا دییشیکلیکلر تکلیف (پیشنهاد) ائدین.
  • موشتری/مووضوع ایله مۆناسیبتینیزی آچیقلایین.
  • شخصی حسابلاردان ایستیفاده ائدرک دییشدیرین.
  • ایشگؤتورمه یاردیمی: بنزر مقاله‌لر اۆزرینده ایشلمیش ایسپانسر (داوطلب دییشدیریجی) آختارین و یا ایسته‌نیلن مقاله‌لر واسیطه‌سیله مقاله مؤوضوعلاری اۆچون ایده‌آللار تقدیم ائدین.

قئید ائدک کی، بو، یالنیز منفعتلرین توققوشماسینی اَحاطه ائدیر. دییشدیریجیلره اؤز تجروبه‌لرینه عاید مؤوضوعلاردا یازماق تؤوصیه اوْلونور: مثلاً، ناسا مۆهندیسی ژوپیتر حاقیندا یازا بیلر و یا اینگیلیس پروفسورو مارک توین حاقیندا یازا بیلر. همچینین، علمی و یا مدنی قوروم طرفیندن اؤدنیشلی، ائو صاحیبلیگی ائدن و یا باشقا شکیلده ایسپانسرلیک ائدن ویکی‌پدیاچیلار و یا دیگر تجروبه‌چیلر کوراتورلارلا اَمکداشلیق ائدرک مضمون یۆکله‌یه و مقاله‌لر یازا بیلر، دولاییسی ایله ائو صاحیبلری اۆچون مۆثبت برندینق تعمین ائدیر.

قارالامانیزی یارادین دَییشدیر

It's always a good idea to draft your article before adding it to the main article space, and it's required for very new contributors. The article wizard will guide you through the steps of creating a draft.

Prior to drafting your article, it's a good idea to look at several existing Wikipedia articles on subjects similar to yours to see how such articles are formatted. The quality of our existing articles varies, so try to pick good ones.

مقاله ویزاردی

When you feel that the article is ready, you can submit it for review by an experienced editor. If there isn't already a "Submit for review" button on the draft, you can add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft to submit it. A reviewer will then look at your draft and move it to the main article space or give you feedback on how to improve it. You can always edit the page, even while waiting for a review.

Autoconfirmed users can publish their drafts to mainspace as Wikipedia articles via a pagemove, as explained in Wikipedia:Drafts#Publishing a draft.

و سونرا نه؟ دَییشدیر

ایندی صفحه‌نی یاراتدیغینیزا گؤره هله ده ائده‌بیله‌جیینیز بیر نئچه شئی وار:

تکمیللشدیرمه‌لره داوام ائدین دَییشدیر

Wikipedia is not finished. Generally, an article is nowhere near being completed the moment it is created. There is a long way to go. In fact, it may take you several edits just to get it started.

If you have so much interest in the article you just created, you may learn more about it in the future, and accordingly, have more to add. This may be later today, tomorrow, or several months from now. Any time – go ahead.

فورمتلشدیرمه‌نی تکمیللشدیرین دَییشدیر

To format your article correctly (and expand it, and possibly even make it featured!), see

Others can freely contribute to the article when it has been saved. The creator does not have special rights to control the later content. See ویکی‌پدیا:مقاله‌لرین یییه‌لیگی.

Also, to avoid getting frustrated or offended about the way others modify or remove your contributions, see Wikipedia:Don't be ashamed.

یتیملردن چکینین دَییشدیر

یتیم مقاله، اوْنونلا علاقه‌لی باشقا مقاله‌لر آز اوْلان و یا هئچ اوْلمایان مقاله‌دیر. یتیمله باغلی اَساس موشکول اوْدور کی، اوْ، باشقالارینا معلوم اوْلمایاجاق و یتیملیکدن آزاد ائدیلمسه، داها آز اوْخوجو توپلایا بیلر.

اَکثر یئنی مقاله‌لر یارادیلدیغی آندان یتیمدیر، لاکین سیز بونو دییشدیرمک اۆچون ایشله‌یه بیلرسینیز. بو، بیر و یا بیر نئچه دیگر مقاله‌نین دییشدیرمه‌سینی اَحاطه ائده‌جک. مقاله‌نیزین مؤوضوعسونا ایستیناد ائدن دیگر صفحه‌لری ویکی‌پدیادا آختارماغا چالیشین، سونرا هر ایکی طرفه قوشا کوروشه علاوه ائدرک همین ایستینادلاری کئچیدلره چئویرین: «[[» و «]]». If another article has a word or phrase that has the same meaning as your new article that is not expressed using the exact same words as the title, you can link that word or phrase as follows: "[[title of your new article|word or phrase found in other article]]." Or in certain cases, you could create that word or phrase as a redirect to your new article.

One of the first things you want to do after creating a new article is to provide links to it so it will not be an orphan. You can do that right away, or, if you find that exhausting, you can wait a while, provided that you keep the task in mind.

See Wikipedia:Drawing attention to new pages to learn how to get others to see your new articles.

دقیقلشدیرمه صفحه‌سینه علاوه ائدین دَییشدیر

ایصطیلاح غیری-موعیندیرسه (بو و یا اوْخشار باشلیقدان ایستیفاده ائدن بیر نئچه صفحفه وار دئمکدیر)، همین باشلیغی داشییان مقاله‌لر اۆچون دقیقلشدیرمه صفحه‌سینین اوْلوب-اولماماسینا باخین. اَگر بئله‌دیرسه، مقاله‌نیزین لینکینی همین صفحه‌یه علاوه ائدین.

هله ده کؤمه‌یه احتیاجینیز وار؟ دَییشدیر

Read a traditional encyclopedia دَییشدیر

Try to read traditional paper encyclopedia articles (or good or featured articles on Wikipedia) to get the layout, style, tone, and other elements of encyclopedic content. It is suggested that if you plan to write articles for an encyclopedia, you have some background knowledge in formal writing as well as about the topic at hand. A composition class in your high school or college is recommended before you start writing encyclopedia articles.

The World Book is a good place to start. The goal of Wikipedia is to create an up-to-the-moment encyclopedia on every notable subject imaginable. Picture your article being published in a paper encyclopedia.